Posted August 21, 2020

A Timely Reminder : Statutory Limitation Period for Commencing Legal Proceedings Relating to Domestic Building Disputes

person in orange long sleeve shirt writing on white paper

Statutory Limitation Period

It is well established that a building action cannot be brought more than 10 years after issuing the certificate of occupancy for the building work or 10 years after the date of the certificate of final inspection of the building work if no certificate of occupancy has been issued.

What has thrown a spanner in the works is that section 56 of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 prohibits a party to a domestic building dispute from making an application to VCAT in relation to the dispute unless a certificate of conciliation has been obtained from the Domestic Building Dispute Resolution Victoria (DBDRV).

Is a referral to the DBDRV considered the commencement of a ‘Building Action’?

The question as to whether an application to the DBDRV is to be considered the commencement of a building action was considered and decided upon by Deputy President Aird in Owners Corporation 1 Plan No PS543073S v Eastrise Constructions Proprietary Limited (Building and Property) [2019] VCAT 1639 (Eastrise).

In Eastrise, the Applicant body corporate lodged an application with the Tribunal more than 10 years after the date the occupancy permit was issued. However, it did make an application to the DBDRV prior to the expiry of the 10-year limitation period and, therefore, argued that the referral to the DBDRV constituted the commencement of a building action within the limitation period.

The Builder took the view that the body corporate’s action was statute barred and sought orders that the proceedings be summarily dismissed as misconceived and that the Applicant pay the cost of the proceedings.

Deputy President Aird gave a well-considered decision and made analysis of inter alia, the meaning of an ‘action’; the purpose of the DBCA being consumer protection legislation; and the purpose of section 134 of the Building Act as being a bookend for claims for the protection of builders/building practitioners.

Ultimately, Deputy President Aird held at paragraphs 44 and 45:

… Because an application was not made to the Tribunal within the 10 year limitation period, the Owners have lots their rights to make a claim against the builder.

Accordingly, the proceeding is misconceived and must be dismissed, the Owners’ claims having clearly been brought after the expiry of the 10 year limitation period for the brining of a ‘building action’

Limitation Period soon to Expire?

So, what should you be doing if the limitation period on your potential building action expires soon but you have not yet obtained your certificate of conciliation?

The answer is simple… submit your Application to VCAT despite not having obtained your certificate of conciliation yet!

In Eastrise, Deputy President Aird stipulated in paragraphs 38 and 39:

The Tribunal has taken the view, that where an application is lodged shortly prior to the expiration of the limitation period, it is appropriate to stay the proceeding pending the receipt of a certificate of conciliation, as it could not have been intended by the legislature, that parties to a ‘domestic building work dispute’ lose their rights to bring a claim because of the introduction of this mandatory scheme.

Alternatively, a party can apply to a court under s57A(1)(b) for leave to commence a proceeding in the court without a certificate of conciliation issued by DBDRV.

The prudent approach by the Owners would have been to have made an application to the Tribunal within the limitation period and to have sought a stay pending the lodging of certificates of conciliation issued by DBDRV, consistent with the principles enunciated by McDonald J in Burbank Australia Pty Ltd v Owners Corporation19. As I said in Warren’s Plumbing and Drainage Services Pty Ltd v Sharma20 at [18]:

I am satisfied that this is a procedural requirement which can be cured by the proceeding being stayed pending the applicant obtaining a certificate of conciliation from DBDRV.

Lessons Learnt

It is important to constantly check that you are within the limitation period for bringing a building action against a builder. Be aware that a referral to the DBDRV is not a building action and will not stop the limitation period clock from ticking.

The only way to ensure that you have commenced a building action in time is to make an application to VCAT within the 10-year limitation period. If you do not, it is likely that your claim will be statute-barred, and any rights that you may have had will be lost.

For assistance on any body corporate or Building Law matters, please contact Emilia Panayiotou at CLP Lawyers at 9042 2070 or at emilia@clplawyers.com.au

Written by
Change Body Corporate
The contents of this article or website are only intended to provide a general overview of the topics discussed. The author of this article makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information and the information is not intended to constitute investment, legal or professional advice. You should seek professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content. This article does not contain references to any specific company, organisation or individual, unless expressly specified.
Still looking for answers your manager should be giving you?
We help Committees of 10+ lot buildings who are tired of being left in the dark. Tell us what’s going on, and we’ll help you move forward.

    Please note: Our services are exclusively for Committees of buildings with 10 lots or more.

    Nov 8, 2019 Laws & Regulations

    Can Your Body Corporate Ban Short-Term Letting? 50,000 QLD Owners Need Answers

    Short-term Letting Body Corporates: Clearing Up the Confusion Recent media coverage of a Queensland court decision regarding short-term letting in a body corporate has caused…

    Mar 6, 2018 Laws & Regulations

    Body Corporate Law: We need to talk about building defects

    Inevitably, there are going to be mistakes made in constructing and finishing a 20-storey tower. Critical Building Elements and Contractor Responsibility Construction involves critical elements that demand careful attention…

    Mar 1, 2019 Laws & Regulations

    Body Corporate Management Update: Owner Gets to Keep Balcony

    Who is responsible for fixing a balcony on common property that has fallen into disrepair but was constructed without the approval of the body corporate? The answer may surprise you.

    Aug 5, 2019 Laws & Regulations

    Common Property Boundaries and the Water Act – Who is Liable for Unreasonable Flows of Water into an Apartment?

    The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal has published a decision that provides some further clarity as to how a Plan of Subdivision is interpreted to determine the boundaries between the…